How to lose votes and alienate EU-friends

 

love corbyn hate brexitDear Jeremy and Labour Party comrades

I have decades of experience campaigning in Lambeth and across London. I am currently a member of Vauxhall CLP EC and a coordinator for the local Momentum group. I am writing to share my concerns about how the current EU election is being run.

The  day after I received my postal voting form I received a personalised letter from the Lib Dem’s Mayoral candidate. I see from Facebook that lots of other postal voters have received similar from the Brexits. But nothing from Labour. We wouldn’t know an election is going on!

In my constituency the chance to get out on the doorstep and explain that our unrepresentative hard Brexiteer MP, Kate Hoey, does not represent the views of local Party members has been seized by all wings of the Party with enthusiasm. Three of London’s MEP candidates are members of this constituency. Again, all wings of what is often depicted as a politically split CLP have welcomed their nominations and are eager to campaign for them.

But – along with the lack of attention being given to the thousands of postal voters, who faced with a long and complicated ballot form let alone a short and ‘complicated’ (in the Facebook sense of the word) campaign really need some guidance – the Labour Party machinery has not just been unhelpful but at worst has pushed activists away.

I manage a Community Centre but was quickly told that it would be impossible to host any kind of rally or meeting there because, even if I personally donated the cost, it would not be permitted as it would be charged against election expenses. I have even been told that putting up a Labour poster is banned. (By the way, I have no intention of obeying that edict – and if it is true then I would like to see it in writing.)

It does not help that this lacklustre attitude to campaigning – so unlike the spirit of the 2017 campaign – is reflected in the paucity of literature that has been produced. What has been produced is dire. Instead of suggesting that the European Parliament funds the Met Police, the NHS and schools (and is therefore responsible for the current cuts), why haven’t the policies contained in the excellent PES manifesto, which Labour signed up to some months ago, been used as the basis for spelling out what our MEPs can do; why hasn’t the excellent record of what socialist MEPs have achieved contained in Labour’s own European Manifesto been mentioned? That Manifesto is great – but who’s going to know that. It’s top secret.

Instead we get the fluffy Hallmark slogan of ‘bringing our country together again’. To do that requires honesty, bravery and a clear position on Brexit. These elections are about Europe. The issue cannot be ignored. It has to be confronted head on. Is it any surprise that the two parties who are rising in the polls are the two who are campaigning with the clearest message in respect of Brexit.  A clear strong message will do more to bring the country together than woolly ambiguity.

And what about social media ? From voter registration drives, to enthusiastically selling the messages in the Manifesto across Facebook and Twitter, the Party could be doing so much more. More than nothing, that is. In 2017 Labour dominated social media – why are we not doing the same by recapturing the spirit we found then? Labour’s posts don’t even mention the elections. It is being left to individual candidates to wage an air war on their own. And to individual CLPs like my own to organise doorstepping, canvassing, and photo ops with the candidates and the rare Shadow Cabinet Minister who is actively campaigning to get across Labour’s internationalist message.

Having seen the complexity of the ballot paper, with 10 Parties and 11 independents standing in London, the party needs to at least be explaining the voting system! Will there be ‘Get-out-the-vote’ leaflets doing that or will it, like everything else about this campaign, be left to individual candidates and grassroots members to do that. Without spending any money?

I gather the spending restrictions are because any expenditure now may get charged against a future early general election. But it won’t be spending too much at the GE which will lose us votes. It will be not campaigning now. We are losing the General Election campaign on the doorstep today . Once voters – and members (a third of Labour List readers!) – abandon Labour to vote for another party they rarely come back. The majority of Labour members and voters in London support remaining in the EU, and we have been losing members and voters in my constituency for months because of our MP’s and the Leader’s positions on Brexit. If Labour does badly on 23 May because of the lack of campaign support already unhappy members will be even further demotivated.

Complex messages need to be got across in this election. We need to be explaining how voting for other smaller parties is a wasted vote as they are not in a position to either deliver the public vote on Brexit of their claims – only Labour can do that – nor are they in a position to influence the policies and practices of the European Union – only Labour and its allies in the S&D can challenge for the Commission Presidency and affect the EU’s attitude to the UK. And we need to be spelling out that only Labour is committed to challenging the growth of fascist and alt-right populism across Europe and in the UK.

London is a great working class city and the majority of its diverse, multi-national residents want to stay in the European Union. We have great candidates who will represent this city and its people heart and soul.  Let’s please tell Londoners who they are, how to vote, and why, above all, they should vote Labour. Against austerity, for real action against climate catastrophe, for peace and prosperity across our continent.

I feel obliged to complain like this because if ordinary members like me don’t, then nothing will change.90a243ae-cfe8-4112-8830-0dc546ce0e45

In hope and solidarity

Joan

 

 

Footnote:

I’m pleased to say that after I wrote this the Labour Party machinery swung into action – in London at least – and has produced election material, including on social media. Hundreds of Party members have enthusiastically accompanied our candidates on the doorstep. But, as the same time, far too many members are saying they are voting for one of the smaller Remain parties. A wasted vote, which could allow Farage’s Party to top the poll and send a message to Europe and the world that a bunch of anti-European, anti-migrant right-wing little-Englander charlatans represent the values and opinions of this country.

I will be voting Labour on Thursday and I call on all socialist Remainers to do the same.

Joan, 19 May 2019 

4 thoughts on “How to lose votes and alienate EU-friends

  1. Sorry, I’m done with Labour for the moment. As soon as pro-brexit Katy Clark was imposed as third on the list of the slate it meant I couldn’t in good conscience vote Labour. I’ve been a member for many years, and I intend to remain so – but I will not be voting at this election.

    Like

  2. here is my post on my local party forum
    I am a firm “Remainer” but have fully supported the Party’s policy (put forward by previous Leaders, Ed Miliband and Harriet Harman and included in our General Election Manifesto and agreed by Conference) to recognise the result of the Referendum, whilst acknowledging the strength of feeling of those who voted to remain.

    I have also been opposed to a further referendum/People’s vote – initially because I thought it would be divisive and indecisive (latterly I have come to think that a further referendum is more likely to reinforce the decision to leave) but the main reason for my opposition was that to question the outcome of the referendum could be seen as a challenge to democracy and those people who voted to leave, angry that their voice is not listened to by the political elite, would have that view reinforced.

    We have to accept that the country is divided, Parliament is divided, the Party is divided and I believe it was right to try to build a consensus that might bring the Party and the country together. Jeremy and Kier have been skilful in trying to argue a compromise based upon membership of a Customs Union. The mainstream media has called on politicians to co-operate and compromise, which is precisely what Labour has been doing but rather than being portrayed by the Media as the Party bringing the nation together, it has been portrayed as indecisiveness and fence sitting. Largely as a result of media distortion Labour is now seen as being pro-Brexit by Remainers and as stopping Brexit by those who wish to leave.

    In Brighton and London which are solid remain territory some Labour voters say they will vote Lib Dem or Green because Labour is pro-Brexit. I do speak with people outside of Brighton and the London/Westminster bubble, however, and conversely, in the north and traditional Labour strongholds, most of which voted to leave, we are perceived as a party trying to stop Brexit and are losing votes. There is some evidence, however, that a majority of Labour members and many traditional Labour voters in these areas favours remaining. Their doubts about supporting Labour on Thursday might be overcome if there is a commitment to a confirmatory vote.

    In the light of the impasse and the recent breakdown in talks with the government, which is due entirely to the Prime Minister’s intransigence, I have come to the view that the only way to break that impasse is for whatever deal can be agreed by Parliament to be put to a public vote. I recognise that I live in a strongly remain constituency but am alarmed by the number of Labour supporters (and some members) who say they will not be voting Labour on Thursday. I do believe that a commitment to a confirmatory vote might bring them back.

    Following the EU elections on Thursday, what should our position be when Parliament returns? Despite being opposed to an attempted re-run of the Referendum, I welcomed the PLP’s decision to back the recent Kyle amendment to ensure a confirmatory public vote and would hope that something similar might be agreed when May’s proposals come back to the Commons. There may be some procedural difficulty if May’s proposal comes back as a Bill which can only be amended in committee after 2nd Reading. There is no certainty that Parliament would agree a 2nd Reading – unless there is a clear agreement that an amendment for a confirmatory vote would be accepted in Committee.

    There is also confusion as to what the choices would be in a confirmatory vote. It has been suggested that the choice would be between May’s/Parliament’s deal and the status quo on the assumption that the status quo is “Remain” but, as article 50 has been agreed by Parliament, it could be argued that the status quo is “Leave” and without any further agreement by Parliament we would leave with no deal in October. Clearly that still needs to be clarified.

    My main concern, however, is that we cannot just go on like this and a decision must be reached to end the impasse so that we can then focus on the issues that can lead to a Labour victory at the next election – health, education, housing, transport, public services, welfare, equalities, the environment…..

    We had a bold and radical manifesto at the last election which confounded the pollsters and brought us close to victory. With such a manifesto we can win next time but unless we break the Brexit impasse we will continue to haemorrhage support both in remain areas and leave areas.

    I have written to Jeremy Corbyn, Keir Starmer and John McDonnell urging them to make clear that Labour is committed to a confirmatory public vote on any deal – even if it is ours – and do so before Thursday.

    Like

Leave a reply to John Austin Cancel reply